Temperature over the past 11,000 years.  

Nice going, 20th century!

Read some pull quotes and a link to the new paper in Science:  http://www.contriving.net/link/b4

Google+: Reshared 5 times
Google+: View post on Google+

  1. Sadly climate change deniers already attacking it although they don't offer any rebuttal evidence or research that shows the data is wrong.

  2. This is such a controversial subject you are really on thin ice talking about it and with that in mind I'll shut up about the subject of global warming. Having said that if as much money had been spent on finding alternatives to fossil fuel as has been and is spent on finding more fossil fuels I wonder what we could have achieved.

  3. +Bill Callinder-Scott Thin ice?  NOAA, NASA, and 99% of climate scientists are in agreement.  

    Yeah those skeptics with no factual data or peer reviewed studies are right and the rest are all wrong. Seriously? 

    Climate change deniers burying their heads in the sand.

  4. It's only_politically_ controversial. Nothing controversial about the science.

  5. Purchase Article?!!!! Anyone read it?

  6. Thanks Kent but that site only has more commentary and does not count as fact checking. I would really like to know what the different coloured bands mean and how they were able to mix ice core data, which is from a single point on the planet with data from weather stations that are spread across the planet.

  7. +Kent Goertzen No pun was intended although it's there even if unintended. I was only making the point that I have no opinion one way or another because regardless of whether you are in agreement that Global Change is caused by human activity or not as soon as you open your mouth or make a written comment someone shoots you down in flames. I knew it was a big mistake making any comment whatsoever even if I feel I made a valid point. Some day fossil fuel will disappear or become uneconomic to extract so why wait?

Leave a Reply