Tag Archives: Google - Page 36

Jupiter’s Trojan asteroids and the Lagrangian points

Reshared post from Yonatan Zunger

Jupiter and the Sun are the two largest objects in our Solar System, and as they orbit around one another, they create regions where their gravity roughly cancels out. These are the Lagrangian points, created whenever two objects orbit one another: places where gravity is such that another small object can follow along in the orbit without being pulled in or out. And since things aren't getting pulled out of there, they get stuck in there as well: and so we have two large clumps of asteroids (and miscellaneous smaller space debris) in Jupiter's orbit. These are called the Trojan Asteroids; the group ahead of Jupiter is known as the Greek Camp, and the group behind it the Trojan Camp, with the asteroids in each camp being named after famous people in that war. Together, these two camps have as many asteroids as the Asteroid Belt.

Other stable patterns are possible, too: another one is what's called a 3:2 resonance pattern, asteroids whose motion gets confined to a basically triangular shape by the combined pull of Jupiter and the Sun. This group (for Jupiter) is called the Hilda Family, and their route forms a triangle with its three points at the two Lagrange points and at the point on Jupiter's orbit directly opposite it from the Sun. 

None of these orbits are perfectly stable, because each of these asteroids is subject to pulling from everything in the Solar System; as a result, an asteroid can shift from the Lagrange points to the Hilda family, and from the Hilda family to the Asteroid Belt (not shown), especially if it runs into something and changes its course. 

The reason that Pluto was demoted from planet to dwarf planet is that we realized that these things are not only numerous, but some of them are quite big. Some things we formerly called asteroids are actually bigger than Pluto, so the naming started to seem a little silly. So our Solar System has, in decreasing order of size, four gas giant planets (Jupiter, Saturn, Neptune and Uranus); four rocky planets (Earth, Venus, Mars, and Mercury); five officially recognized dwarf planets (Eris, Pluto, Haumea, Makemake, and Ceres); and a tremendous number of asteroids. (We suspect that there are actually about 100 dwarf planets, but the job of classifying what's an asteroid and what's actually a planet is still in progress — see the "dwarf planet" link below if you want to know the details)

Ceres orbits in the Asteroid Belt, about halfway between Mars and Jupiter, just inside the triangle of the Hilda Family; Pluto and Haumea are both in the distant Kuiper Belt, outside the orbit of Neptune but shepherded by its orbit in much the same way that the Hildas are shepherded by Jupiter; Makemake is what's called a "cubewano," living in the Kuiper Belt but unshepherded, orbiting independently; and Eris is part of the Scattered Disc, the even more distant objects whose orbits don't sit nicely in the plane of the Solar System at all, having been kicked out of that plane by (we believe) scattering off large bodies like Jupiter.

But mostly, I wanted to share this to show you how things orbit. This picture comes from the amazing archive at https://web.archive.org/web/20130702191409/http://sajri.astronomy.cz/asteroidgroups/groups.htm, which has many other such pictures, and comes to me via Max Rubenacker. 

More information about all of these things:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange_point
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trojan_(astronomy)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilda_family
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dwarf_planet
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuiper_belt
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scattered_disc

#ScienceEveryDay

Originally posted on Google+ · March 7, 2013

ISS Tour

Here's a pretty cool 1-hour long tour of the International Space Station wherein André Kuiper takes you through all the modules and just gets really detailed in explaining what is going on.

Originally posted on Google+ · March 6, 2013

Micro-motion Magnification

This is pretty cool.  They detect minuscule motions in video and amplify them.  The example the concentrate on in this video below is showing someone's pulse when all you have is a video of them.  

It works with video they took, or with any video of someone…like a scene from Batman. 

Originally posted on Google+ · March 6, 2013

Untitled post

Originally posted on Google+ · March 5, 2013

Two rats’ brains linked into one, even across continents

I haven't had the time to do anything more than skim this paper, but it looks like they connected two rats brains together and they managed to "become one".  They even had one in Brazil and one in the US, connected over the internet.

I don't suppose we're too far from being able to do the same with humans and implantable electronics.

A Brain-to-Brain Interface for Real-Time Sharing of Sensorimotor Information : Scientific Reports : Nature Publishing Group
A brain-to-brain interface (BTBI) enabled a real-time transfer of behaviorally meaningful sensorimotor information between the brains of two rats. In this BTBI, an “encoder” rat performed sensorimotor…

Originally posted on Google+ · March 3, 2013

Copernicus crater

Copernicus crater:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copernicus_(lunar_crater)

Originally posted on Google+ · March 2, 2013

Ze Frank’s Human Test: yes to almost all of them

Yes to almost all of them.

Originally posted on Google+ · March 2, 2013

A shark-horse: the most science-y thing I’ve posted in months

This is the most science-y thing I've posted in months.

Originally posted on Google+ · March 2, 2013

Nick Bostrom and others on existential risk

 Are we in danger of extinction?  What kind of things could cause us to go extinct?

The article touches on AI and if it could threaten our existence in the future.

‘There is important research going on in those areas, but the really impressive stuff is hidden away inside AI journals,’ he said. He told me about a team from the University of Alberta that recently trained an AI to play the 1980s video game Pac-Man. Only they didn’t let the AI see the familiar, overhead view of the game. Instead, they dropped it into a three-dimensional version, similar to a corn maze, where ghosts and pellets lurk behind every corner. They didn’t tell it the rules, either; they just threw it into the system and punished it when a ghost caught it. ‘Eventually the AI learned to play pretty well,’ Dewey said. ‘That would have been unheard of a few years ago, but we are getting to that point where we are finally starting to see little sparkles of generality.’

Bostrum also talks about why he hopes we don't find life on Mars.  By "great filter" he's talking about the idea that either advanced life on Earth is a cosmic fluke or there is something that prevents civilizations from becoming more space-worthy than our own…in other words, how come we don't see aliens out in the universe.

That’s why Bostrom hopes the Curiosity rover fails. ‘Any discovery of life that didn’t originate on Earth makes it less likely the great filter is in our past, and more likely it’s in our future,’ he told me. If life is a cosmic fluke, then we’ve already beaten the odds, and our future is undetermined — the galaxy is there for the taking. If we discover that life arises everywhere, we lose a prime suspect in our hunt for the great filter. The more advanced life we find, the worse the implications. If Curiosity spots a vertebrate fossil embedded in Martian rock, it would mean that a Cambrian explosion occurred twice in the same solar system. It would give us reason to suspect that nature is very good at knitting atoms into complex animal life, but very bad at nurturing star-hopping civilisations. It would make it less likely that humans have already slipped through the trap whose jaws keep our skies lifeless. It would be an omen.

Ross Andersen – Humanity’s deep future
When we peer into the fog of the deep future what do we see – human extinction or a future among the stars?

Originally posted on Google+ · February 27, 2013

Logging my screen to Evernote every five minutes

I just finished writing a small program that, every 5 minutes, takes a screenshot of my whole screen and uploads that along with text describing every window I have open along with which window is active to my Evernote account.  I'll upload it to github after I test it for a few days.

Next up is figuring out a way to get a list of every tab I have open in Chrome and uploading that as well.

After that, I'm going to figure out a way to upload to clip every page I have open for longer than … maybe 5 minutes? … into Evernote.  I'd also like to write an extension for Chrome to clip articles that I view in Google Reader for longer than a certain amount of time as well.

I was spurred into this by reading the below linked article about Chris Dancy.

I'm a little worried about dropping all this data into Evernote.  I mean, what if the company goes under?  In the future, in addition to clipping to Evernote, I will FTP this data onto storage that I control as well as dropping it into a database.

The Quantified Man: How an Obsolete Tech Guy Rebuilt Himself for the Future | Wired Enterprise | Wired.com
Our work is being re-quantified — in a big way — and Chris Dancy, a director in the office of the chief technology officer at BMC Software, thinks it’s time for employees to take these metrics into …

Originally posted on Google+ · February 27, 2013