Category Archives: Science

Web sites aren’t golf carts

Today, I was telling my mom about a web app I’m developing for property owners, property managers, or landlords and she said something that got me thinking about a misconception some people have.  With concern she asked:

How do you know all of the reports that a landlord might want?

I kind of stuttered around because of course I don’t know all the reports landlords might want.  I didn’t know what to say because it threw me for a loop.  It was kind of like the owner of a horse and buggy asking the owner of those new-fangled car thingies, “but where do you put the reigns?”  We’re talking about different paradigms.

I’m fairly familiar with the business, I grew up around it, and I’ve read many books on the subject and interviewed a decent number of potential users of the product but I’m no accountant that spends all day, every day doing financials for a company with 10,000 apartment units.  I wouldn’t claim to know everything my users might need no matter who the potential audience of my site might be, and that doesn’t matter!

Web sites as applications are even better at this than software in general, but you don’t have to have every plausibly useful feature implemented on the day you push the site to production.  Over time the site just becomes more and more useful to its users.

Here’s how the ownership experience could work if a golf cart worked like a web application.

Web app as a golf cart

So you bought a golf cart.  Here it is:

It's clean!  It doesn't make funny noises!

It’s clean! It doesn’t make funny noises!

You use the cart for a few weeks, but it’s not really comfortable or as useful as it could be and the manufacturer recognizes this.

Then, one day you go out to take it a spin and it’s transformed!

Now our custom embroidered golf bag won't get wet if it starts raining.

Now our custom embroidered golf bag won’t get wet if it starts raining.

Amazingly, you didn’t spend any more money, or really do anything other than get usage out of it up to this point and all of a sudden it’s better!

This is nice.  But.  Always a “but”.  Golf cart users are a fickle bunch, and, well, it’s just not very stylish! This update to the golf cart gets rave reviews from the pragmatic crowd, but a lot of users shun it because it’s kinda ugly.

I’m sure you can guess what happened.

It's beautiful and not overdone at all.

It’s beautiful and not overdone at all.

All of your golf-cart-using buddies are so jealous.  You’re the envy of the neighborhood.

After some time golf cart owners start asking “If we’re riding around on wheels wouldn’t it be nice to be able to go places other than the next hole on the course?”

The manufacturer hears the cries.

You guessed it, a few days later you’ve got an electric car!

It goes on roads.

It goes on roads.

It’s cool.  It goes places.  It’s more featureful and useful than that original basic golf cart.

You get months of use out of it.  You can’t imagine it being any better.

One day, you go out to your garage and find it transformed yet again!

Now THIS is a golf cart!

Now THIS is a golf cart!

What exactly does this have to do with a web site?

Web sites (and software in general) aren’t a thing. When you create a website it’s an evolving, ever changing construct that continues to get better without any effort on the end users part.  It just gets better.

Cool new views of the Andromeda galaxy

Andromeda.

Read more here: Cool, New Views of Andromeda Galaxy (NASA JPL)

Cool Andromeda
Cool Andromeda: ESA/Herschel/PACS & SPIRE Consortium, O. Krause, HSC, H. Linz

Andromeda’s Colorful Rings
Andromeda’s Colorful Rings: ESA/NASA/JPL-Caltech/B. Schulz (NHSC)

Originally posted on Google+ · February 18, 2013

Mars Express natural-colour view near Amenthes Planum

High-Resolution Stereo Camera nadir and colour channel data taken during revolution 11497 on 13 January 2013 by ESA’s Mars Express have been combined to form a natural-colour view of the region southeast of Amenthes Planum and north of Hesperia Planum.  The region imaged, which lies to the west of Tinto Vallis and Palos crater, is centred at around 3°S and 109°E, and has a ground resolution of about 22 m per pixel. The image features craters, lava channels and a valley from which water may have once flowed. Dark wind-blown sediments fill the valleys and the floors of the craters.

-Wired

Originally posted on Google+ · February 18, 2013

Every known meteorite fall since 2300 BC, on a map

Every metorite fall (that we know of) since 2300 BC on an interactive map.

That's actually just a screenshot because a link to the page just gives you a boring looking text link.

Access the map here:  https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/interactive/2013/feb/15/meteorite-fall-map

Originally posted on Google+ · February 18, 2013

Reconstructing the Chelyabinsk meteor’s path with YouTube and Google Earth

Chelyabinsk meteor + Youtube + Google Earth = Figuring out it's flight path.

I had the same idea, but someone else was less lazy than I…

Like many others, I was absolutely astounded by the meteor strike over Chelyabinsk when I woke on Friday morning. One silver lining to our self-surveilling society is that an event of this magnitud……

Originally posted on Google+ · February 17, 2013

Statistical analysis of 10,000 porn stars

Statistical analysis of 10,000 porn stars.

An analysis of 10,000 porn stars’ careers and demographic profiles that uncovers what they really look like, what they do, and how their role has changed

Originally posted on Google+ · February 17, 2013

Smallest rotary motor in biology, the ATP synthase

Smallest rotary motor in biology, the ATP synthase

More info on your warehouse of information: Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATP_synthase

#science #Biology #Microbiology  

Originally posted on Google+ · February 17, 2013

Missouri bill redefines science, gives equal time to Intelligent Design

Rick Brattin's bill here in Missouri trying to get intelligent design into schools includes his own definition of scientific theory.

Although even the Wikipedia entry for scientific theory includes definitions provided by the world's most prestigious organizations of scientists, the bill's sponsor Rick Brattin has seen fit to invent his own definition. And it's a head-scratcher: "'Scientific theory,' an inferred explanation of incompletely understood phenomena about the physical universe based on limited knowledge, whose components are data, logic, and faith-based philosophy." The faith or philosophy involved remain unspecified.

Bill has a long list of brain-melting stipulations.

Originally posted on Google+ · February 13, 2013

The decline effect and the scientific method

Such anomalies demonstrate the slipperiness of empiricism. Although many scientific ideas generate conflicting results and suffer from falling effect sizes, they continue to get cited in the textbooks and drive standard medical practice. Why? Because these ideas seem true.

This is a drum I find myself beating quite often nowadays.  If I was a professional scientist this would be weighing on me constantly.  Actually, I guess it already does that.

Science (particularly the messy social sciences) has a problem.  It turns out that we're not really able to figure things out, and that when we think we have, we soon find out we're wrong…and then continue to act like we're right anyway!

Now, don't get me wrong…the scientific method is the most powerful thing humanity has ever created.  I believe in science.  However, we've got a lot of work to do with regards to how we practice it.  Yes, it's the most powerful truth-discovering tool.  No, it's not as good as it could be.

Originally posted on Google+ · February 9, 2013

Most people do not expect to understand things

One of the things that I've noticed about this is that most people do not expect to understand things. For most people, the universe is a mysterious place filled with random events beyond their ability to comprehend or control.

-pjeby (from here: http://lesswrong.com/lw/1mh/that_magical_click/1hd7)

I feel this is an accurate statement.  I even vividly remember when I first made this observation when I was around 12 years old.  It drastically shaped my view of why humanity is the way it is.

Originally posted on Google+ · February 9, 2013